The first
command that we are trained to give passengers when the aircraft is making an
emergency landing (water or land) is to brace. To adopt the most suitable
impact position for the landing. These positions were created specifically to
reduce the injuries and enhance life expectancy in case of a real life
emergency landing.
The most suitable example would be a car crashing against a concrete wall at 100 km / h: a deceleration is produced in just a phew seconds but the body continues
travelling at the same speed, there is when the seat belt and the body impact
prevention position helps to reduce the G force that the body feels. Something
that also happens is that the backrest of the seat that you have in front of
you and also yours (doesn´t matter if you are in First, Business and Economy) will
bend forward. This is created so that the backseat protects you against flying objects
that could harm you during the rough deceleration of the aircraft.
The rapid
transformation and re generation of several airlines to re adjust and re adapt
to the world financial crisis has been felt worldwide and here is where this
traumatic G force has really affected carriers around the world. This is why a
total of 189 airlines only in the United Stated of America territory had declared
bankruptcy since 1990 (The Associated Press statistics - 2011) and worldwide an
average of 800 airline carriers have closed, declared bankrupt or became a subsidiary
of another airline.
In spite of the generation of new concepts as for example
the creation of an all business class carrier, ex called Atlantic Express and
then re baptized Eos Airline based in New York (2004 – 2008), it couldn´t survived the raise of oil prices, airport operational and Government licenses, flying permissions,
amenities for passengers, in-flight catering, ground and air staff, crew
training, insurance, taxes and fees, trade union so and so on.
To have a more accurate idea
of financial figures here you may see certain average costs:
A 737-700, the
basic Boeing from the category 737 cost an average of in 2012 of U$S 74.8
million while the new 747-8 is an average of U$S 351.4 milion – Boeing.
Jet-fuel price
may vary from the bottom point of this year that was proximally 265 cents/
gallon (April 2013) and its highest pick almost 308 cents / gallon (July 2013) –
Air Transport Association, “Argus daily composite jet-fuel price for Chicago,
Houston, Los Angeles and New York”.
In matter of the
tax burden, so you can get an idea has “nearly tripled since 1972, rising from
$22 (7 percent) to $61 (20 percent)” - Airlines for America.
A pilot with 10 years of
experience may cost in the year 2013 an average of U$S 89.000 according to the website
SimplyHired.
So you can get an idea
of how much does airline food business moves just ask LSG Sky Chefs by LSG
Lufthansa Service Holding AG subsidiary of Deutsche Lufthansa Ag, which just
made revenue of €
2.5 billion from the year 2012. The prime customers of this group are:
Czech Airlines, Tam Airlines, Qantas, Alaska Airline and Lufthansa. According
to MSN Money in “The Death of the Airline Meal” the cost of a meal service per
passenger in an extra long haul flight for a US Carrier could be as low as U$S
3, 5.
So the breakdown of a $300 domestic
roundtrip ticket from Los Angeles to Chicago in the year 2013 according to the Airline for
America is:
20 % Federal Government Taxes, that are U$S
64.19
21 % Fuel Cost, that are U$S 63.47
17 % of Labor Expenses, that are U$S 51.52
41 % of Non-Labor / Fuel operating and
other expresses, that are U$S 123.11
Leaving the airline a profit of 0.1
%, that is 41 cents of an American US dollar. This is why American companies
make cutbacks in many amenities and services towards passengers:
Ex-Northwest Airline (USA) now Delta
Airlines, in the year 2005 eliminated free pretzels saving the airline a total
of U$S 2 million that year. Another clear example of cutbacks was in the year
1987 when American Airlines remove one olive from each salad in First Class
saving an average of U$S 40,000 that year. And the extreme case is by low cost
airline Ryanair (based in Dublin – Ireland), when they reported in October of
2011 the elimination of all bathrooms except one, so in that way the airline may
enhance the seating rows of the aircraft and reduce the air fare an average of
5 % per passenger. Now a day’s Air France reduced the quantity of products
offered to Business Class passengers in their amenity kits and also they pinned
Business Class headsets’ to their seats so they won´t get removed from the aircraft,
because of this many times they are dirty or obsolete as they are broken.
When it comes to non low coast
carriers the reduction of amenities and commodities to passengers affects
directly the satisfaction of customers even so they promote an amazing
marketing work to lower the impact of those decision in the clientele. So if
you take something from a place to enhance another thing from another place,
what is the true cost in a short, medium and long range? Is it worthy? Even so they brace for impact the sudden deceleration
will affect somehow and someway their structures.
European and American budget airline
carriers have lost the battle this past years in matters of service and
excellence, as for now they have not been seen in the top ranking of Skytrax. This
is why Middle East and Asian carriers have set foot in excellence and
innovation adapting a modern fleet to satisfy customer needs. But the main
reason that they may do this is because Middle East has the oil and trade unions don´t exist, many countries in the region don't pay high taxes or even they don't have and wages for air and ground staff are not as high as
American or European ones. And on the other hand in many countries in Asia
trade unions also don´t exist but at the same time they are not into a
borderline recession as the past years as many countries in Europe or even
United States, also wages for ground and air staff are not so high and this particulary region controls the main production of commodities worldwide.
Even so these airlines
are currently flying high to the future they should have a clear view that oil will eventually strike out and that people tend to
believe more in their human rights defending them with much more conviction
than many years ago. They will just have to remember to be responsible and
responsive for their own safety procedures in case of an emergency landing.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario