For many years I
have seen and heard many different opinions, lived many different experiences
and tried many different airline products. I was recently asked what did I
think about Economy Class, which is the best one to travel?
An excellent economy is not only made and constructed by “investing” millions of dollar in
the seats and in the entertainment system; or just by making the aircraft
interior mood a more pleasant one; or by having a good gourmet choice; or by
offering a 5 star service concerning Crew. Is not a matter of “or” is really a
choice of providing the very best in details in the overall product. Not only
an excellent economy is chosen by its in-flight service and general performance,
but it is also by what the client may experience and that includes the
interaction of the passengers with others, the ground area of human resources: ground
staff.
Many airports around the world are enhancing there structures due to the large volume of passengers that they are receiving each year but also a bigger gap is being induced between economy and premium classes.
In big international airports such as: Charles De Gaulle in Paris – Frankfurt Main in Germany– JFK in New York – Guarulhos in Sao Paulo Brasil each time a Y (economy) passenger checks´ in he may lose between thirty minutes to even an hour doing the queue (this may happen for big aircrafts such as 777, 747 or A380). Then security and immigration: another hour to hour and a half. In addition to all of that passengers deal with the ground staff mood and treatment, that sometimes it may not be the best.
Also, you may
have an excellent product on board but if you travel to a specific destination
you may enhance the chances of not having a pleasant trip as certain passengers
from certain Nationalities may not behave properly and annoy you during the
entire journey. For example if you travel to India you may encounter very unpleasant
passengers: people who may spit on the floor and barf while eating or they may
leave the bathroom very dirty. Even so you choose an excellent product you may
not enjoy it due to certain unpleasant circumstances, that tend to be more often that you
think.
Furthermore as
the commercial airline industry is growing in an unprecedented speed many airlines need to buy or rent bigger aircrafts, increase the frequency between
destinations and put more seats in economy. The last decision affects directly
in the customer satisfaction.
The very well renowned
“ergo economic seat” is a product that has been chosen worldwide by many
airlines. The real objective of the seat is to create a false sense of space, that´s it.
Due to the design the real seat volume and pitch has been reduced for the past years creating a false sense of room. This is when airlines advertise that: “there is more space between your knee and the seat in front of you” when actually your back length barely fits and the armrest each time is narrower. Now days the adjustable foot rest has been placed in many aircrafts but it doesn´t provide comfort, it´s just marketing. An average 1.80 meters / 5 feet 10 travelling in an extra long haul destinations (more than six and a half hours of journey) usually don´t have a pleasant rest. The real objective of the “ergo economic seat” is to try to make the skinniest seat possible so in that way they may enhance the volume of passengers in each flight by introducing more seats to the cabin. The best marketing strategy to downsize the negative effect is to provide a state-of-the-art entertainment system so customers may numb themselves with their personal screen. It works but then when they reach their destination they are usually with body pain and disorientation even so they already jet lag.
Due to the design the real seat volume and pitch has been reduced for the past years creating a false sense of room. This is when airlines advertise that: “there is more space between your knee and the seat in front of you” when actually your back length barely fits and the armrest each time is narrower. Now days the adjustable foot rest has been placed in many aircrafts but it doesn´t provide comfort, it´s just marketing. An average 1.80 meters / 5 feet 10 travelling in an extra long haul destinations (more than six and a half hours of journey) usually don´t have a pleasant rest. The real objective of the “ergo economic seat” is to try to make the skinniest seat possible so in that way they may enhance the volume of passengers in each flight by introducing more seats to the cabin. The best marketing strategy to downsize the negative effect is to provide a state-of-the-art entertainment system so customers may numb themselves with their personal screen. It works but then when they reach their destination they are usually with body pain and disorientation even so they already jet lag.
Usually the main
strategy of the commercial airline industry is to numb as much as possible the
economy class passenger while Business and First is to provide pleasure during
the whole journey. Not only they try to achieve that by providing a
state-of-the-art entertainment system but also by giving “free” amenity kits: a
pair of socks, toothbrush and toothpaste and eye shades. Also they may include
body splash and hand cream from a well renowned company in their bathrooms but
that is it, real comfort is not offered just numbness.
To give you an
idea in the 1970´s and even in the 1980´s 747-400 seat configuration in Y class
was usually 2-4-2 nowadays it´s 3-4-3 and even 3-5-3 in some airlines. The A380 its
usual configuration is 3-4-3 and also in the 777. So a new problem has been
created, the plague of the middle seat.
So if I have to
give my personal top 5 in Economy Class in which I evaluated them by overall
service, even so they may numb the passenger, I would say (from 1 being the best):
5) Qantas:
ground staff are usually friendly and polite, check in procedures in Sydney
International Airport – Kingsford Smith tend to be fast and overall in-flight
products are good.
4) Cathay
Pacific: ground staff are extremely polite and tries to help passengers even so
they don´t understand the language that the client is speaking. Very well
distributed and efficient terminal in Hong Kong. In-flight product may numb
very well Y passengers.
3) Air Japan:
ground staff are from another dimension regarding organization and precision.
Very accurate in how-to treat passengers and direct them inside the Tokyo International
Airport (Narita) extremely well. Crew are excellent trained concerning in-flight service and
not only aircrafts are very well cleaned but also the seat may
be comfortable for some passengers.
2) Malaysia
Airlines: is exactly the same as Air Japan, the only difference is the
Malaysian Hospitality (MH) may be a little bit warmer than Air Japan. Also the KUL
– The Kuala Lumpur International Airport has been designed to speed up all of
check in procedures.
1) Singapore
Airlines: the Changi Airport in Singapore has been design perfectly to prevent wasting
your time. All the check in procedure is perfectly orchestrated by the staff. From my point of view they offer an exact
mixture of warmth but distance from the passenger. Not only they naturally reflect
how polite and respectful they are but also they tend to provide a natural safe
sensation of security to first travels, something that is not that common to
find now-a-days. The product presentation is flawless from the seat design and
in-flight service, literally you may feel comfortably numbed until you reach
destination.
(I don´t own the above picture)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario